給(gei)(gei)了高(gao)工(gong)(gong)(gong)資(zi)，就一定能夠減(jian)少(shao)(shao)人員(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)流失嗎？最好的員(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)跟最一般(ban)的員(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)，他(ta)們之間的工(gong)(gong)(gong)資(zi)差距至少(shao)(shao)應該在5到(dao)10倍以上(shang)。應該有一個2000塊錢(qian)的基本(ben)工(gong)(gong)(gong)資(zi)的員(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)，也(ye)有一個能夠每個月拿到(dao)2萬(wan)以上(shang)的員(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)。如果基本(ben)的員(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)，一般(ban)的員(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)都拿到(dao)2萬(wan)，那么最優秀的員(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)他(ta)應該拿到(dao)20萬(wan)才對。愿意給(gei)(gei)員(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)高(gao)工(gong)(gong)(gong)資(zi)，但是(shi)給(gei)(gei)員(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)高(gao)工(gong)(gong)(gong)資(zi)的目(mu)的是(shi)什(shen)么？是(shi)留住人才，而不(bu)是(shi)減(jian)少(shao)(shao)員(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)流失，這是(shi)兩個完全不(bu)一樣的事情(qing)。
換句話，想表達(da)的(de)(de)就(jiu)(jiu)是(shi)，如果(guo)(guo)這(zhe)個(ge)員工(gong)(gong)(gong)真的(de)(de)是(shi)人(ren)(ren)才，那就(jiu)(jiu)應該給(gei)到(dao)(dao)他高工(gong)(gong)(gong)資。如果(guo)(guo)他不是(shi)人(ren)(ren)才，該流失(shi)就(jiu)(jiu)流失(shi)，同時該拿低工(gong)(gong)(gong)資就(jiu)(jiu)拿低工(gong)(gong)(gong)資。個(ge)人(ren)(ren)一(yi)直(zhi)覺(jue)得(de)，對于一(yi)個(ge)企業(ye)，老(lao)板(ban)一(yi)定(ding)要(yao)舍得(de)花錢(qian)給(gei)那些人(ren)(ren)才，去掙(zheng)錢(qian)，但(dan)是(shi)不是(shi)人(ren)(ren)才掙(zheng)不到(dao)(dao)錢(qian)就(jiu)(jiu)很(hen)正常，這(zhe)個(ge)才能夠對人(ren)(ren)才有真正的(de)(de)激勵，就(jiu)(jiu)是(shi)我(wo)只(zhi)要(yao)努力，我(wo)只(zhi)要(yao)做出(chu)好(hao)的(de)(de)業(ye)績，我(wo)只(zhi)要(yao)做出(chu)好(hao)的(de)(de)績效(xiao)，我(wo)就(jiu)(jiu)能拿出(chu)很(hen)高的(de)(de)工(gong)(gong)(gong)資。但(dan)是(shi)如果(guo)(guo)想通過給(gei)高工(gong)(gong)(gong)資來減少人(ren)(ren)才流失(shi)，這(zhe)個(ge)就(jiu)(jiu)是(shi)錯的(de)(de)。
轉載：//bamboo-vinegar.cn/zixun_detail/118433.html
